Open office team collaborating while reviewing data across multiple monitors.
Team working together in office analyzing information and dashboards.
Security Awareness Training

Simplify behaviour change with automated, risk-based learning

Transform risky employee behaviour and foster a stronger, long-lasting culture of security. 

Why It Matters

Traditional security awareness training is not enough 

Basic cybersecurity awareness training may tick the compliance box, but it won't build the security culture required to stop today's human-activated threats. You need to identify high-risk users, educate them on your organisation's real threats and help everyone play a meaningful role in reducing risk. 

95%
of cyberattacks involve the human element
68%
of working adults bypass security knowingly
60%
of working adults are unsure of their responsibilities in securing their organisation
Product Details

Measure human risk at the individual user level 

Proofpoint ZenGuide helps you provide targeted, data-driven education beyond traditional security awareness training and phishing tests. 

Behavioural and Role-Based Risk Insights

Evaluate user behaviour, roles and access to identify individuals with the highest risk and impact.

Threat-Informed Risk Scoring

Incorporate threat exposure, vulnerabilities and phishing performance into user risk assessment.

Streamlined Threat Reporting

Enable fast reporting with an easy-to-use ‘Report Suspicious’ button across email and mobile devices. 

Automate risk-based learning at scale 

Effortlessly create and customise targeted education for your high-risk employees and enrol them automatically, saving time and effort. 

See a demo of AI ThreatFlip 

Adaptive User Grouping and Enrolment

Group users by risk, role and behaviour to automatically assign relevant training programmes.

Dynamic Learning Paths and Simulations

Deliver multistep training with simulations, assessments and guided learning experiences.

AI-Powered Simulation and Training

Recommend simulations and turn real attacks into training with Proofpoint Satori Phishing Simulation Agent and AI ThreatFlip.

Deliver engaging, personalised learning experiences 

Educate users across a wide range of security topics, difficulty levels, formats and languages. Offer global learners a unique learning experience for maximum impact. 

Flexible and Contextual Learning

Deliver microlearning and just-in-time guidance based on user behaviour and real-world risk context. 

Accessible Learning Experiences

Support global users with WCAG-based accessibility settings for inclusive and consistent training. 

Gamified User Engagement

Encourage participation with interactive dashboards that reinforce progress and secure behaviour. 

Measure and improve programme outcomes 

Track your users' behaviour changes and benchmark them against your industry peers. Combined with Human Risk Explorer, ZenGuide reveals high-risk users and their risky behaviours, and tracks changes over time, ensuring better communication and ongoing improvement.

Colleagues reviewing information together on desktop computer in office.
Comparison

Proofpoint ZenGuide vs traditional awareness training 

Features Proofpoint ZenGuide Traditional Training
Turn real phishing emails into instant learning and ready-to-run simulations
Yes
No
Deploy AI agents to recommend attack-informed programmes.
Yes
No
Automate simulation creation and targeting with AI to free analyst time
Yes
No
Measure and drive behaviour change—not just course completion
Yes
No

Empower your users with Proofpoint Collaboration Security Prime 

Embed risk-based learning into every collaboration channel with Proofpoint Collaboration Security Prime. Stop the most advanced attacks across email, collaboration tools and cloud apps with a single integrated solution. 

Professional smiling while using laptop during online training session.
Request a Demo

Request a demo

Turn live threats into personalised, instant learning and reduce human-activated risk.

FAQ

FAQ

  • How effective is security awareness training? 

    Security awareness training is only as effective as its ability to reinforce skills and adapt to each user's level of risk. Traditional programmes fall short because they don't provide role‑based content, realistic phishing simulations or timely feedback mirroring live security threats. Witho...

    Security awareness training is only as effective as its ability to reinforce skills and adapt to each user's level of risk. Traditional programmes fall short because they don't provide role‑based content, realistic phishing simulations or timely feedback mirroring live security threats. Without steady practice in recognising phishing emails, social engineering and proper reporting steps, users struggle to build strong habits that help prevent human-activated attacks. 

    The best results come from a few proven practices: 

    • ​Role‑ and risk‑based content that targets users with greater exposure 
    • Realistic phishing simulations that reflect current attacker tactics 
    • Just-in-time coaching that guides decision-making at the moment of risk
    • Ongoing reinforcement through microlessons, periodic assessments and behaviour tracking 
  • Why isn't traditional security awareness training enough to reduce human cyber risk? 

    Traditional security awareness training isn’t enough because infrequent, one‑size‑fits‑all courses don’t change everyday behaviour or keep pace with new attacker tactics. Static lessons may meet compliance needs, but they don’t help people respond to live, novel threats.  ...

    Traditional security awareness training isn’t enough because infrequent, one‑size‑fits‑all courses don’t change everyday behaviour or keep pace with new attacker tactics. Static lessons may meet compliance needs, but they don’t help people respond to live, novel threats. 

    Its main limitations tend to be: 

    • ​​Lack of personalisation: Everyone receives the same training, regardless of role or behaviour. 
    • Low frequency: Annual or occasional sessions don’t build lasting habits. 
    • Limited insight: Programmes don’t measure real decisions or simulation performance. 
    • Slow response to threats: Content rarely updates fast enough to match evolving attacks. 
    • Minimal feedback: Users don’t receive timely guidance when they make risky choices.